"Harvard University economist John Friedman says he and a group of colleagues found that students who progress during their kindergarten year from attaining an average score on the Stanford Achievement Test to attaining a score in the 60th percentile can expect to make about $1,000 more a year at age 27 than students whose scores remain average. Taking into account all variation across kindergarten classes, including class size, individuals who learn more--as measured by an above-average score on the Stanford Achievement Test--and are in smaller classes earn about $2,000 more per year at age 27. Moreover, students who learn more in kindergarten are more likely to go to college than students with similar backgrounds. Those who learn more in kindergarten are also less likely to become single parents, more likely to own a home by age 28 and more likely to save for retirement earlier in their work lives."
Back home in Hong kong, the start formal education at two and half or three year old. Sometime I feel it's too much for the little ones, but compare to the US system, they are just two extreme. I agree with teaching them yet, you can just see them absorb everything like a sponge when they are 2-6, way before they start 1st grade =)
I agree...they are two definite extremes. If we can find the perfect balance between the two systems, I think we would have found the perfect education system for our kids! Working on that!!! :)
Back home in Hong kong, the start formal education at two and half or three year old. Sometime I feel it's too much for the little ones, but compare to the US system, they are just two extreme. I agree with teaching them yet, you can just see them absorb everything like a sponge when they are 2-6, way before they start 1st grade =)
ReplyDeleteI agree...they are two definite extremes. If we can find the perfect balance between the two systems, I think we would have found the perfect education system for our kids! Working on that!!! :)
ReplyDelete